Military Aerospace Technology Today is: Oct 10, 2007
Volume: 6  Issue: 1
Published: Feb 21, 2007

Download Who's Who in DISA 2007

Download 2007 VETS GWAC Catalog

Download DISA 2007 Contracts Guide

Download PEO-EIS 2007 Catalog

Military Aerospace Technology Online Archives

This article was Originally Published on Mar 06, 2004 in Volume: 3  Issue: 1

Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems & Solutions

Interview with Jerry Lindfelt

Vice President Surveillance & Reconnaissance Systems

Print this Article
Send a Letter to the Editor

Jerry Lindfelt is vice president of Lockheed Martin’s Surveillance and Reconnaissance Systems, which focuses on the development of tactical intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) systems that integrate air, space and ground capabilities. Surveillance & Reconnaissance Systems is a line of business within Lockheed Martin’s Integrated Systems & Solutions (IS&S) business area, which was formed last year to provide national security customers advanced, horizontally integrated systems that enhance their operational effectiveness.

Q: Tell us about Lockheed Martin’s Surveillance & Reconnaissance Systems.

A: For decades, we have developed and maintained significant ISR elements for both tactical and national customers. We are also the original developer and patent-holder of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) technology, and continue to develop tactical SAR sensors, foliage penetration SAR sensors and exploitation capabilities for key military transformation initiatives.

Q: Can you comment on the movement towards interoperability in the post-Operation Iraqi Freedom environment?

A: Some say this was the first truly joint war in which we saw, for example, the Air Force providing fire support to the Army on the move and more coordinated air battle planning among the services and coalition partners. While we are in the very early stages of interoperability across traditionally stove piped platforms and systems, I think this war affirmed the power of jointness and interoperability as means to enhance mission effects and capabilities. In response, our customers are focusing efforts in organizations such as the Joint Forces Command. Within the acquisition community, they are instituting a number of process changes, including requirements to view traditional platform-type acquisitions through an architectural lens to ensure their interoperability in the context of a warfighting system of systems. The objective in this increasingly “network-centric” environment is to shorten the timelines in moving data to knowledge to action, and we see several significant positive steps in that direction.

Q: How do you contribute to this “network-centric environment”?

A: We recognize the Future Force’s vision: a seamless, network-centric environment where war fighters have real-time access to decision-quality information. The government wants network-centric information from all sources—then they must be able to exploit that information in real-time to carry out missions. What we often do is first to look at the need, and then determine the best value solution to meet that need. In doing that, we realize that we may not have the best subsystem to meet every requirement. That requires us to bring in government and commercial partners to provide the best value solution and to conduct rigorous analysis and testing to ensure the system will provide the desired capabilities.

Q: Are you currently working on any network-centric military programs from a tactical ISR perspective?

A: We are providing Multi-INT fusion expertise for the Army’s Future Combat System. We are also on the industry team selected for the Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS) 10.2 Multi-INT upgrade, which will be the backbone of this transformational architecture. The 10.2 upgrade will transform the DCGS for the Air Force by integrating multiple intelligence systems into a single, worldwide network-centric ISR enterprise. This DCGS integrated backbone will also be used by the Navy, Army and Marine Corps.

Q: Technology is advancing at a phenomenal rate. How do you stay ahead of the curve in the tactical ISR arena?

A: Historically, it was very expensive to make incremental changes in technology, because in the past, system upgrades were driven by hardware improvements rather than software technology. Over time, we have embraced a more software-centric approach to technology. Yesterday, sensors and platforms drove missions, and acquisitions were largely focused on upgrades and replacements. Today, sensors and platforms are nodes on an increasingly interconnected battle space network. Recognizing that, we now focus on architecturally based solutions that provide capable, scalable frameworks for the military systems of the future.

Q: What do you see as key network-centric issues?

A: Ongoing threats in Afghanistan, Iraq and other arenas underscore the critical need for a persistent, responsive ISR presence. No doubt the military needs a clear, continuous picture of the battlefield and the ability to execute fast, informed tactical decisions. However, in a network-centric environment, services must be willing to share data. This evolution requires more than technological change—there must be a cultural change. Just as the military is adopting horizontal integration strategies to respond to these technology and cultural drivers, Lockheed Martin is changing to ensure we continue to help our customers address their significant challenges.

To Top

Home | Archives | Events | Contact | Advertisers | Subscribe

Defense Consulting & Outsourcing  Military Advanced Education  Military Geospatial Technology  Military Information Technology  Military Logistics Forum  Military Medical Technology  Military Training Technology  Special Operations Technology

Web site by Foster Web Marketing

© 2007 Kerrigan Media International, Inc. All rights reserved. Kerrigan Media International, Inc. ("we," "us") provides publications, information, content, text and graphic material, and other products and services (all and/or any portion of which, are individually and collectively referred to as "KMI Publications"). KMI Publications also refers to web sites, production, processing and communications facilities whether owned, operated or provided by us ourselves or in conjunction with others pursuant to contractual arrangements. KMI Publications are for informational purposes only and your access, use, subscription to or display of any KMI Publications is subject to applicable U.S. law and regulation, as well as certain international treaties. You may access and use KMI Publications and download and print or create only one copy of content or the information in KMI Publications, solely for your own personal use. You may not republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute materials from any KMI Publications, without our prior written permission. Modification of or useof any KMI Publications for any other purpose is a violation of our copyright and other proprietary rights, and is strictly prohibited. All trademarks, service marks, and logos used on or in KMI Publications are either ours or are used with permission.