There's likely to be plenty of business buzz over the
next five years as the defense industry, supercharged by soaring defense
budgets, goes on a deal-making spree. In the latest move Northrop Grumman
is attempting to acquire TRW - and TRW's space business. Northrop Grumman
initially made an unsolicited $5.9-billion bid that TRW didn't accept;
Northrop Grumman then tried a hostile takeover by offering TRW shareholders
$47 per share.
It's part of Northrop Grumman strategy in recent years
of branching out of aerospace to become a full-spectrum defense contractor.
In a speech last March, Chief Operating Officer Ron Sugar said that
a decade ago, "The defense industry was in free-fall, Northrop Grumman
was a company that was largely dependent on the B-2 bomber and some
fighter plane work, and it wasn't clear at all that the company had
a long-term future, and what was decided was that the future world was
going to require improvement in sensing, intelligence, surveillance,
reconnaissance, the ability to project power at great distances and
precision strike, and an increasing dependence on fiber warfare and
the whole cyber sphere as an environment of warfare..."
Among the company's latest acquisitions have been Litton
and Newport News Shipbuilding, which Sugar said has transformed the
company from an "Air Force house" to one whose largest customer is the
Navy. Scooping up TRW is a logical move that's good "if they don't
pay too much," said Todd Ernst, an analyst for Prudential Securities
in New York. A Prudential research report concluded that "TRW's space,
aeronautics, and IT businesses are highly complementary to Northrop's
businesses, but are also additive, especially in key of defense space
and missile defense capabilities, in our view. There also appears ample
opportunity to create synergy savings and improve the margins of TRW's
businesses, some of which are at the low end of the defense industry
range, we believe."
Defense Industries' 'Sweet Spot'
If the deal goes through, Northrop Grumman will be
able to use TRW to enter lucrative areas such as missile defense. The
Prudential analysis said, "Approximately $5.3 billionâ??about 38 percentâ??of
TRW's 2001 revenue was from aerospace and defense businesses, which
include complementary capabilities such as UAV development and production,
C4ISR, government/defense information systems, and aeronautical systems.
Additive capabilities [for Northrop Grumman] include missile defense,
laser, and space communications that are in the 'sweet spot' of where
future defense spending will grow most rapidly, in our view."
Naturally, the deal has its risks. Some of TRW's projects
are "high-risk development programs, such as airborne laser, space-based
laser and SBIRS [Space-Based Infrared Systems] Low, where there is some
question as to if and when they will enter production," said Ernst.
In addition, Northrop Grumman may already be stretched thin as it digests
its acquisition of Newport News Shipbuilding.
Yet the biggest hurdle to Northrop Grumman's offer
is that TRW shareholders aren't buying it. On April 17, they rejected
an Northop Grumman offer of $53 per share of stock. Providing defensive
support for Cleveland-based TRW is Ohio securities law that impedes
hostile takeovers.
"Northrop Grumman's offer is clearly an opportunistic
attempt to acquire TRW's premier franchise," said a statement by chairman
Philip Odeen [see separate article, page 12]. "In particular, the current
planned increases in government defense spending are expected to benefit
many technologies and arenas where TRW's space, electronics and systems
businesses are a leader."
TRW's board of directors advised shareholders to reject's
Northrop Grumman's because:
- Northrop Grumman's offer grossly undervalues TRW's businesses and
opportunities;
- TRW's independent financial advisors, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and
Credit Suisse First Boston, concluded that the offer is inadequate
to the company's common shareholders; and
- Northrop Grumman's offer is highly conditional, which results in
significant uncertainty that the offer will be consummated.
- In the battle for the hearts and minds of shareholders, TRW's board
of directors have responded to Northrop Grumman's bid by touting their
own plan to boost the company's financial picture. The plan calls
for:
- Accelerating TRW's debt reduction program by aiming for a $1.6
billion to $2 billion reduction in 2002, on top of the nearly $1 billion
in 2001; and
- Spinning off the company's automotive operations into an independent,
publicly traded company in six to nine months.
TRW Acknowledges Other Suitors
Even if Northrop Grumman's offer falters, other companies
could try to scoop up TRW. A TRW statement acknowledged interest from
other parties: "TRW and its independent financial advisors have received
unsolicited indications of interest from third parties with respect
to a transaction with the company as a whole which would involve a separation
of the Automotive business. In addition, the company has received unsolicited
indications of interest from third parties with respect to each of its
operating businesses as well as a private equity investment in the entire
company." In addition, TRW said it has begun "preliminary negotiations
for a potential sale of its Aeronautical Systems Group."
Some prospective suitors that have been mentioned include
Lockheed Martin, Boeing and U.K-based BAE Systems. High stock prices
give companies leverage for acquisitions, and Northrop Grumman shares
dipped below $80 last August before roaring back to a post-9/11 high
of $118.89 on Feb. 21. As of April 15, shares were fractionally above
$113.
However, Ernst said, there's a question whether any
of these others suitors are really suitable. Northrop Grumman. Lockheed
Martin would find it difficult to face more debt, he said, while both
Lockheed Martin and Boeing would face more regulatory hurdles than Northrop
Grumman. As for BAE, "we have encountered serious doubts among our most
trusted sources that the UK-based company might be allowed to seriously
bid on part of America's space-related family jewels."
More Deals on the Way
Meanwhile, other deals in the defense industry are
in the offing. Ernst sees a possibility of a major deal among The Big
Five contractors, which include Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop
Grumman and General Dynamics.
Yet the real hot spot will be the numerous medium-
and small-size aerospace companies. Since Sept. 11, stock prices for
smaller public companies have soared. Take FLIR Systems, a Portland,
OR-based maker of imaging equipment, whose share price surged from just
over $7 in March 2001 to a high of $59.50 on March 6 this year.
This has spurred a herd of privately held companies
to ride to Wall Street. Since Sept. 11, there has been a spate of Initial
Public Offerings (IPOs). In February, Integrated Defense Technologies,
a Huntsville, AL-based maker of electronic systems for platforms such
as the F-16 and C-17, went public. Anteon International, a Fairfax,
VA-company with fingers in the intelligence and missile defense pies,
went public in March. In the opening hours of its debut, Anteon jumped
17 percent.
Soaring prices give these companies the cash to buyâ??or
an inducement to sell. Wall Street has seen a spate of privately held
companies that have decided to go public, as Mantech, Anteon and United
Defense Industries. Philip Finnegan, an analyst for the Teal Group in
Fairfax, VA, expects to see other defense contractors divest operations
as they focus their operations on selected areas. TRW already plans
to spin off its auto parts operations, while Raytheon has divested its
aircraft integration systems unit.
L3 Communications, a medium-sized maker of communications
and surveillance gear acquired the unit for $1.13 billion in cash. The
cash infusing the defense industry is certain to encourage a wave of
acquisitions as buyers and sellers capitalize on high share prices.
This is likely to consolidate the defense industry into the Big Five
plus a narrower base of smaller firms.
"Instead of the pyramid we have now, you will see a
rectangle," said Jon Kutler, chairman of Quarterdeck Investment Partners
in Los Angeles.
L3 Aggressively Seeking Buys
Several analysts cite L3 as a prime example of a company
that is aggressively hunting acquisitions. L3 has scooped up more than
24 companies in the past five years. In January it acquired SY Technology,
a small company whose business includes missile defense. "SY Technology
is an excellent acquisition for L-3 because it broadens our base of
capabilities within the missile defense market," said L3 CEO Frank Lanza
at the time (see sidebar).
A major incentive for this is that the highest profit
margins lie in delivering complete systems rather than components. "Smaller
players will find it more difficult to compete against the larger companies,"
said Finnegan, who expects to see smaller companies coming together
to offer integrated systems.
Financial analysts tend to be wary of naming specific
stocks that might be acquired. But Finnegan did note that intelligence
is a likely sector for consolidation because of the number of small
firms making surveillance gear.